<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tolaris.com &#187; wireless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tolaris.com/tag/wireless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tolaris.com</link>
	<description>When the going gets tough, the tough sniff packets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The new mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.tolaris.com/2010/05/04/the-new-mouse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tolaris.com/2010/05/04/the-new-mouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Wagner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tolaris.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve just bought a Logitech M205 wireless notebook mouse. Like my older MX650, this mouse uses the 27 MHz spectrum. The wheel doesn&#8217;t tilt, but it has a power switch and you can stow the receiver on the underside of the mouse. So far I&#8217;m very happy with it as a travel mouse. I&#8217;ll keep [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just bought a <a href="http://www.logitech.com/en-au/notebook_products/mice/devices/5495">Logitech M205</a> wireless notebook mouse.  Like my older MX650, this mouse uses the <a href="http://www.tolaris.com/2009/09/29/why-i-use-a-27-mhz-cordless-mouse/">27 MHz spectrum</a>. The wheel doesn&#8217;t tilt, but it has a power switch and you can stow the receiver on the underside of the mouse.  So far I&#8217;m very happy with it as a travel mouse.  I&#8217;ll keep the MX650 for my regular work desk.</p>
<p>It seems Logitech is going entirely to 2.4 GHz for their mice. This is very disappointing, as the spectrum is so crowded. I&#8217;d love to switch, but the interference problems with wifi are horrible. The tiny &#8220;unifying receiver&#8221; used by their new devices is pretty slick too, but I doubt you could put an effective 27 MHz antenna in such a small dongle. Does anyone make a modern mouse which doesn&#8217;t use 2.4 GHz or bluetooth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tolaris.com/2010/05/04/the-new-mouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I use a 27 MHz cordless mouse</title>
		<link>http://www.tolaris.com/2009/09/29/why-i-use-a-27-mhz-cordless-mouse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tolaris.com/2009/09/29/why-i-use-a-27-mhz-cordless-mouse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Wagner</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tolaris.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently switched my primary mouse from a Logitech V450 to a much simpler Logitech RX650. The RX650 is a basic OEM mouse. It is larger than the V450 and doesn&#8217;t have the useful space below the mouse to store the compact USB receiver. It only has a range of 1.5m from the receiver, compared [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently switched my primary mouse from a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00165XQWM/">Logitech V450</a> to a much simpler <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Logitech-RX650-Wireless-Optical-Mouse/dp/B000UDWF00/">Logitech RX650</a>.  The RX650 is a basic OEM mouse.  It is larger than the V450 and doesn&#8217;t have the useful space below the mouse to store the compact USB receiver.  It only has a range of 1.5m from the receiver, compared to 10m for the V450.  So why did I switch?  Because the RX650 uses 27 MHz for communication, whereas nearly every other cordless mouse on the market today, including my old V450, uses 2.4 GHz.</p>
<p><span id="more-506"></span>The 2.4 GHz spectrum is extremely crowded, especially in cities.  It is commonly used for 802.11b/g wifi, baby monitors, wireless video cameras, and wireless television &#8220;extenders&#8221;.  Plus, devices like microwaves make a huge amount of noise in this spectrum.  In fact, microwaves use 2.4GHz to heat food because it is readily absorbed by water.  So don&#8217;t put your access point in your kitchen.</p>
<p>I first noticed a problem with my mouse a few months ago.  Sometimes the mouse movement became stuttery and a click wouldn&#8217;t register.  The problem coincided with the time that <a href="http://www.bacula.org/">Bacula</a> runs its daily backup of my laptop.  So I initially believed it to be some kind of bus issue with my laptop&#8217;s motherboard.</p>
<p>Then one day I was testing a wifi issue with my <a href="http://www.metageek.net/products/wi-spy_24x">WiSpy 2.4 GHz spectrum analyser</a>.  I know that 802.11 has a lot of issues with <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_WLAN_channels">spectrum overlap</a> between channels, which effectively means that only channels 1, 6, and 11 are useful for wifi.  But since I&#8217;ve also been working in satellite, I know that transmitters have intermodulation effects outside the expected spectrum.  This can lead to noise in adjacent channels.  So I decided to see if this happened to 802.11 signals.</p>
<p>My office network uses 802.11 channel 11, which is 2.462 GHz.  Here is the spectrum when the network is idle.  The full width of a network on channel 11 is overlayed with a blue column.</p>
<div id="attachment_507" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 572px"><a href="http://www.tolaris.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/idle-channel-11.png"><img src="http://www.tolaris.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/idle-channel-11.png" alt="idle network on channel 11" title="idle channel 11" width="562" height="205" class="size-full wp-image-507" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">idle network on channel 11</p></div>
<p>Now here is the same network, while I&#8217;m running a &#8220;ping -f&#8221; to my office router.</p>
<div id="attachment_508" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 572px"><a href="http://www.tolaris.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/intermodulation-channel-11.png"><img src="http://www.tolaris.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/intermodulation-channel-11.png" alt="intermodulation effects of busy network on channel 11" title="intermodulation channel 11" width="562" height="205" class="size-full wp-image-508" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">intermodulation effects of busy network on channel 11</p></div>
<p>As you can see, even through my network is on channel 11, my wireless card generates 30 dB of noise on channel 6 and 20 dB of noise on channel 1.  My V450 currently operates on channel 3, and it generates only 10 dB of carrier above the noise floor.  When that carrier gets swamped by 20 dB of noise, such as when I&#8217;m uploading a file, the mouse stutters.</p>
<p>So I switched to a 27 MHz mouse.  And now my wireless mouse is just as reliable as a wired one, and far more convenient.  Recommendations on other, good-quality mice that don&#8217;t use 2.4GHz are appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tolaris.com/2009/09/29/why-i-use-a-27-mhz-cordless-mouse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

