<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The new mouse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tolaris.com/2010/05/04/the-new-mouse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tolaris.com/2010/05/04/the-new-mouse/</link>
	<description>When the going gets tough, the tough sniff packets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 05:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.tolaris.com/2010/05/04/the-new-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 07:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tolaris.com/?p=855#comment-184</guid>
		<description>No, we&#039;re not directly affected by the loss of Galaxy 15.  It was positioned at 133&#176;W and covered North America.  We don&#039;t do business there, and it is very unlikely to physically threaten any satellites we do use.  But the loss of any satellite has an impact on the whole industry, as capacity prices change based on supply and demand.  Now a satellite that might have been deployed in my region, lowering prices there, could be diverted to replace Galaxy 15.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, we&#8217;re not directly affected by the loss of Galaxy 15.  It was positioned at 133&deg;W and covered North America.  We don&#8217;t do business there, and it is very unlikely to physically threaten any satellites we do use.  But the loss of any satellite has an impact on the whole industry, as capacity prices change based on supply and demand.  Now a satellite that might have been deployed in my region, lowering prices there, could be diverted to replace Galaxy 15.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DouglasVB</title>
		<link>http://www.tolaris.com/2010/05/04/the-new-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>DouglasVB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 02:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tolaris.com/?p=855#comment-183</guid>
		<description>The pollution of the 2.4GHz spectrum is becoming quite annoying.  Aside from being a smaller package, lower power, longer transmission range, and less regulated, I bet the mass availability of cheap transceivers must really be forcing everyone in that direction.  I wonder what part of the spectrum will be polluted next...

BTW, is your company affected by Galaxy 15 going rogue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pollution of the 2.4GHz spectrum is becoming quite annoying.  Aside from being a smaller package, lower power, longer transmission range, and less regulated, I bet the mass availability of cheap transceivers must really be forcing everyone in that direction.  I wonder what part of the spectrum will be polluted next&#8230;</p>
<p>BTW, is your company affected by Galaxy 15 going rogue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

